On 20 August 2020, the High Court ordered an interim injunction against Royal Mail Group in favour of Preventx, a provider of remote diagnostic testing services and clinical referral services for sexually transmitted diseases (STIs).
SP Power Systems Limited and others v Prysmian S.p.A and others
On 30 July 2020, the CAT published a consent order by which it stayed a damages claim brought by SP
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v Barclays Bank and others
On 27 July 2020, the High Court dismissed an application by UBS AG to strike out or obtain summary judgment in relation to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC-R) claims alleging that UBS AG and other banks had colluded to manipulate the United States Dollar London Interbank Offered Rate (USD LIBOR) benchmark in breach of the Chapter 1 Prohibition and Article 101 TFEU. FDIC-R brought an action on 10 March 2017, more than six years after the conduct at issue.
Strident Publishing Limited v Creative Scotland
On 21 July 2020, the CAT published a ruling refusing to grant Strident Publishing Limited (Strident) permission
Phones4U Ltd (In Administration) v EE Ltd and others
On 17 July 2020, the High Court handed down a ruling on disclosure issues arising in the standalone competition damages case claim brought by Phones 4U Ltd’s (P4U) administrators against mobile network operators (MNOs) EE, Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Vodafone, and O2.
Volvo Car AB and Volvo Personvagnar AB V MOL (Europe Africa) Ltd and Others
On 13 July 2020, the CAT published an order consenting to the withdrawal by Volvo Car AB and Volvo Personvagnar
Competition and Markets Authority v Michael Christopher Martin
On 3 July 2020, the High Court handed down its judgment on an application by the CMA under the Company
Churchill Gowns Ltd and Student Gowns Ltd v Ede & Ravenscroft Ltd and Ors
On 26 June 2020, the CAT published a summary of a claim brought by Churchill Gowns and Student Gowns seeking
Royal Mail Group Ltd v DAF Trucks Ltd & Ors; BT Group plc & Ors v DAF Trucks Ltd & Ors; Dawsongroup plc & Ors v DAF Trucks N.V. & Ors (“Trucks”)
On 23 June 2020, the CAT handed down its judgment on the costs of a preliminary issues hearing in the
Supreme Court Rejects Mastercard and Visa Appeal on Liability but Allows “Pass On” Appeal
On 17 June 2020, the Supreme Court handed down a much anticipated judgment concerning the default multilateral interchange fees (MIFs) set by Mastercard and Visa (together, the Appellants).[1]