Consumer Goods & Retail

Background

The German food retail sector has long faced intense scrutiny from the Federal Cartel Office (FCO). Following a major 2014 sector inquiry into buyer power, the regulator has consistently maintained a strict stance on industry dealmaking: blocking EDEKA’s proposed takeover of Kaiser’s Tengelmann in 2015 (a decision later overturned by ministerial permission in 2016), approving Rewe’s acquisition of Coop in 2016 only subject to divestments, and imposing stringent remedies on EDEKA and Kaufland’s acquisition of Real stores in 2020. EDEKA’s acquisition of 178 Tegut stores marks the latest chapter in these ongoing enforcement efforts. Germany’s Monopolies Commission, an advisory body to the government, criticized the FCO’s clearance as a “blow to competition,” targeting in particular the FCO’s finding of no collective dominance in the sales market despite the “Big Four”’s combined market share exceeding 90%. However, despite potential political influence, no formal process exists to overturn the FCO’s decision.

The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) announced on Wednesday that it has opened three new consumer protection investigations into Trainline, Virgin Atlantic, and RED Driving School over concerns that mandatory fees were not included in the headline prices.[1]

On April 16, 2026, the French Competition Authority (the FCA) issued a decision imposing a €12.67 million fine on Synadis Bio, an organic food retail trade association, and three retailers (Greenweez, Les Comptoirs de la Bio, and ITM Entreprises) for a single, complex, and continuous agreement allocating organic food brands between organic food stores and generalist supermarkets in France (the Decision).[1] The Decision confirms that brand allocation arrangements are restrictions by object and marks the second use of the FCA’s expanded fining powers against trade associations.

The following is part of our annual publication Selected Issues for Boards of Directors in 2026. Explore all topics or download the PDF.

Antitrust in 2025 was marked by policy developments and enforcement that, while remaining aggressive, became less overtly anti-business. The U.S. continued several Biden-era cases but became more open to settlements, while maintaining the new and more burdensome HSR merger notification form and the more aggressive and less economically focused 2023 Merger Guidelines. It also faced leadership uncertainty, particularly at the DOJ. The European Commission conducted DMA enforcement actions and launched a broad consultation on the Merger Guidelines. The UK CMA shifted toward a more restrained approach, taking greater account of growth and signaling flexibility in merger remedies. China’s SAMR began intervening in transactions below filing thresholds and continued using antitrust as a tool amid geo-political tensions.

On January 13, 2026, the Criminal Chamber of the French Cour de cassation (“French Supreme Court”) confirmed its established case law according to which the French Competition Authority (“FCA”) may seize attorney-client documents covered by legal professional privilege (“LPP”) where these were not “prepared for the exercise of a party’s rights of the defense”, i.e., to defend a client who committed, or believes it committed, an offense liable to result in ongoing or anticipated judicial or regulatory proceedings and sanctions.[1]

On January 9, 2026, the French Competition Authority (“FCA”) published the results of its third study on the French leniency procedure.[1]  The Study publishes feedback from more than 60 competition law practitioners on (i) the impact of procedural changes introduced in 2023, (ii) the key factors that encourage or discourage undertakings from applying for leniency, and (iii) the impact of potential follow-on damage actions on leniency applications.  The FCA will determine on the basis of the responses whether and how to adapt its leniency program.

2025 was a fascinating year for UK competition and consumer enforcement, with the CMA changing its policies and practices in a number of areas. Our Year in Review summarises the most important developments of the past year and what we expect in 2026, as the CMA implements its reworked procedures for merger and market cases, begins to use its new consumer fining powers, and imposes digital conduct requirements for the first time. We also anticipate a Government consultation on significant changes to the decision-making model for mergers and markets.

On November 1, 2025, the Commission issued a policy brief[1] in which it rejected calls to extend the legal professional privilege to in-house counsel communication. The Commission examined the question after stakeholders called for such an extension as part of the revision process of the regulation governing antitrust investigation, Regulation 1/2003.[2]

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has launched a significant consumer protection drive targeting online pricing and sales practices across the economy. This represents the first major enforcement effort under the sweeping powers granted by the new Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA). For an overview of the changes brought in by the DMCCA, see our related blog post here.