For more insights and analysis from Cleary lawyers on policy and regulatory developments from a legal perspective, visit What to
For more insights and analysis from Cleary lawyers on policy and regulatory developments from a legal perspective, visit What to …
On December 19, 2024, the French Competition Authority (“FCA”) imposed fines totalling €611 million on 10 manufacturers and two distributors (selling primarily in brick and mortar stores) active in the household appliances sector for engaging in resale price maintenance (“RPM”) practices between February 2007 and December 2014 (the “Decision”).[1] The FCA found that the companies coordinated prices to limit competition from online distributors for over seven years. This is the second largest fine ever levied by the FCA regarding purely vertical practices and the highest fines ever imposed (in absolute terms) on distributors for RPM practices. The FCA also ordered the publication of a summary of the Decision in the paper and online editions of Le Monde and Les Echos’newspapers. However, the FCA rejected the objection relating to a potential horizontal agreement between manufacturers of small domestic appliances.
On November 29, 2024, the German Federal Cartel Office (“FCO”) concluded that Microsoft’s hiring of nearly all of Inflection AI, Inc.’s (“Inflection”) employees together with agreements on financing and the use of Inflection’s intellectual property amounted to a “concentration” under German merger control law. However, due to the lack of “substantial domestic operations” at the time of the acquisition, the FCO declined jurisdiction to review the case.[1]
The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has cleared the Vodafone/Three[1]merger subject to behavioural remedies. The transaction will bring together two of the four largest UK mobile network operators and potentially transform the UK telecoms landscape. The CMA’s approval decision comes against the backdrop of widespread scepticism of consolidation in the mobile telecommunications sector across Europe. It also departs from the CMA’s previous policy of seeking structural remedies to address competition issues and blocking problematic deals where no structural remedy could be found.
On December 5, 2024, the Court of Justice delivered a preliminary ruling in a case involving KIA Auto and its parent company Tallinna Kaubamaja Grupp on the required standard of proof to demonstrate restrictions by effect under Article 101(1) TFEU.[1]
On December 5, 2024,[1] the Paris Court of Appeals (“Court of Appeals”) clarified the scope of its judgment of June 27, 2024, referring back the assessment of TDF’s acquisition of Itas to the French Competition Authority (“FCA”).[2] The Court ruled that the referral was limited to further investigation, while the final decision would be taken by the Court of Appeals (not the FCA).
On December 4, 2024, the French Competition Authority (the “FCA”) sanctioned two airlines, Air Antilles and Air Caraïbes, and one specialised consultant for having implemented a strategy to increase prices and coordinate offers and conditions in the Caribbean inter-island aviation transport sector (the “Decision”).[1] The FCA imposed total fines of €14.57 million, concluding a five-year old investigation.[2]
In the latest instalment of our Antitrust Review podcast, host Nick Levy is joined by colleagues from Cleary Gottlieb’s Brussels…
On November 28, 2024, the Commission published the results of an extensive ex-post study examining its past enforcement of merger control rules in the pharmaceutical sector (the “Study”).[1]
WE VALUE YOUR PRIVACY
This site uses cookies and full details are set out in our Cookie Policy. Essential Cookies are always on; to accept Analytics Cookies, click "I agree to all cookies." Learn more about cookies.