On January 20, 2021, the Criminal Chamber of the Cour de cassation ruled that none of the attorney-client communications relating to the exercise of the client’s rights of defence could be seized during dawn raids, even those that were not related to the antitrust case in relation to which the dawn raids were carried out.
Topics
The EU Commission Fines Video Games Platform and Publishers for Geo-Blocking Practices
Cleary Gottlieb associate Brian Cullen authored, “The EU Commission Fines Video Games Platform and Publishers for Geo-Blocking Practices,” which appeared…
Game Over: Valve and PC Video Game Publishers Fined for “Geo-blocking” Practices
On January 20, 2021, the Commission imposed fines totaling €7.8 million on Valve, the owner of the video gaming platform Steam, and five PC video game publishers[1] for breaching Article 101 TFEU. The Commission found that the companies prevented gamers from activating certain PC video games purchased from sellers in eight Central and Eastern European Member States, where prices are generally lower than in other Member States (so-called “geo-blocking”).[2] This decision is a reminder of the Commission’s strict stance on cross-border sales restrictions.
FCO Safeguards Competition in Mobile Communication Cooperation
On January 19, 2021, the FCO announced that it would closely monitor cooperation agreements between Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone, and Telefónica…
UKRS Training Limited v NSAR
On 15 January 2021, the CAT published an order consenting to UKRS Training Limited (UKRS) withdrawing its action against NSAR Limited (NSAR) alleging a breach of the Chapter 2 prohibition.
The Nuremberg-Fürth Regional Court Dismisses a Damages Action Against the Immunity Recipient in the Confectionary Cartel
On January 14, 2021, the Nuremberg-Fürth Regional Court dismissed an action for damages against a confectionery manufacturer, which participated in an information exchange in the so-called “Four Party” discussion group.[1]
The Court of Justice: Bid-rigging Cartels End With the Signing of the Tender Contract
On January 14, 2021, the Court of Justice held that a bid-rigging infringement[1] ends when the essential characteristics of the tender contract, in particular the amount to be paid for the works that are the subject of the tender contract, have been definitively agreed.[2] This is the moment when the successful bidder and the contracting authority conclude the tender contract, regardless of whether the payment instalments are made, or the works are completed, after this date.
The Commission Approves London Stock Exchange’s Acquisiton of Refinitiv, Subbject to Access Remedies: A (Likely) First in the Industry
On January 13, 2021, the Commission conditionally approved the acquisition by the London Stock Exchange Group (“LSEG”) of Refinitiv, following an in-depth Phase II investigation.[1] The decision likely marks the first-ever access commitment in a merger decision approved by the Commission in the financial sector.[2]
FP McCann Limited v Competition and Markets Authority
On 13 January 2021, the CAT published an order confirming FP McCann Limited (FPM) had infringed the Chapter 1 Prohibition by engaging in a price-fixing and market sharing cartel. As a result, the first condition required for a competition directors disqualification order (CDO) against two of FPM’s directors, Eoin McCann and Francis McCann, was satisfied.
FCJ Confirms: German Merger Control Test Differs From European Test
On January 12, 2021, the FCJ dismissed CTS Eventim’s appeal against a decision of the DCA [1], thus confirming the FCO prohibition of CTS Eventim’s acquisition of Four Artists.[2] In its landmark decision, the FCJ clarified that under German merger control law, any strengthening of a dominant position, even if it is not appreciable, can constitute a significant impediment to effective competition (“SIEC”) and serve as grounds for prohibiting a transaction.