Topics

Background

On March 25, 2019, the Commission fined Nike €12.5 million for breaching Article 101 TFEU by imposing restrictions on cross-border and online sales of football merchandising products within the EEA.[1] The Commission granted Nike a 40% fine reduction in return for its cooperation.

On March 22, 2019, the European Commission’s Hearing Officer published his Activity Report for 2017-2018.[1] The Report provides key statistics on the Hearing Officer’s activity as well as a useful summary of case law on various procedural issues.

On March 21, 2019, the Court of Justice upheld the General Court’s dismissal of the action lodged by Eco-Bat, a British lead recycling company, against the Commission decision imposing a €32.7 million fine in the Car Battery Recycling cartel case.[1]

On March 21, 2019, the Court of Justice issued two orders dismissing Crédit Agricole’s and JPMorgan Chase’s applications for interim measures requested to prevent the Commission from publishing its decision in the EIRD cartel case.[1] The parties had appealed an order issued in October 2018 by the General Court,[2] which rejected the parties’ claims that the Commission should not be allowed to publish its decision on the cartel case while a court appeal against its publication is pending.

On March 20, 2019, the Commission cleared Spirit’s acquisition of Asco, both being active in the supply of aircraft components.[1] The case raised no vertical or horizontal unilateral concerns. However, the Commission imposed remedies to address coordinated effects in the market for slats and slat systems[2] making this the first such case since Hutchison 3G Italy/WIND/JV in 2016.[3]

On March 19, 2019, the General Court annulled the Commission’s decision finding that the voluntary intervention by Fondo Interbancario di Tutela dei Depositi (“FITD”) in support of Banca Tercas (“Tercas”) constituted State aid, granted in violation of Article 108(3) TFEU.[1]

On March 19, 2019, the Commission introduced eLeniency, a new online tool for submitting documents and corporate statements in the…

In a March 18, 2019 paper entitled “EU industrial policy after Siemens/Alstom: Finding a New Balance Between Openness and Protection,” the Commission’s think tank, the European Political Strategy Centre, responds to the “significant backlash against EU competition policy” stemming from its prohibition of the Siemens/Alstom merger in February (reported in the EU Competition Law Newsletter of February 2019).[1]

On March 14, 2019, the ECJ held that the determination of persons liable for damages for an EU competition law infringement is governed by EU law, not national law.[1] The ECJ clarified that an acquirer company may be held liable for private damages caused by a cartel participant even after the cartel participant was subsequently liquidated, provided that the acquirer took over the assets that constituted the business. The ECJ agreed with Advocate General Wahl[2] that the principle of economic continuity should apply not only in public, but also in private antitrust enforcement.