Abuse

On 27 September 2021, the CAT issued its judgment on an application by the proposed Class Representative Mr Le Patourel, for a Collective Proceedings Order (CPO), and an application by BT (a) to strike out the claim pursuant to Rule 41(1) (b) of The Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules 2015 (the Rules) on the basis that there were no reasonable grounds for making it and/or (b) for summary judgment to dismiss the claim pursuant to Rule 43(1)(a) of the Rules on the basis that it had no real prospect of success.

On September 21, 2021, the Milan Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal filed by Digital World Television (“DWT” or “Appellant”),[1] a company active in the distribution of audiovisual programs for adults, against the judgment delivered in 2019 by the lower court, which had also dismissed DWT’s claims for damages against Sky Italia (“Sky” or the “Defendant”) for an alleged abuse of dominant position and/or abuse of economic dependence.[2]

On September 7, 2021, the TAR Lazio rejected the applications brought by associations of undertakings Anica, Anec and Anec Lazio (jointly the “Applicants”),[1] representing the Italian film and audiovisual industry, for the annulment of a decision in which the ICA imposed an interim cease and desist order in proceedings concerning an alleged anticompetitive conduct in relation to free outdoor film screenings.[2]

In a decision dated September 9, 2021, the French Competition Authority (the “FCA”) imposed a total fine of €500,000 on several players in the road freight sector for participating in a single, complex and continuous infringement aimed at organizing a collective boycott of new digital intermediation platforms and geolocation software applications (the “Decision”).[1]