On December 8, 2020, the FCA dismissed a complaint by French travel cooperative CEDIV on behalf of 55 member travel agencies against several airlines which denied travellers refunds for their flights, cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic (the “Decision”).[1]
Industries
The Paris Court of Appeals Ruled That the Decision of Some of the Parties to an Antitrust Investigation Not To Contest the FCA’s Objections Does Not Prevent Other Companies From Challenging the Objections
On December 3, 2020,[1] the Paris Court of Appeals ruled in the Brenntag case that a company challenging its participation in a cartel cannot be held liable simply because other companies did not contest the alleged objections from the FCA. This judgment, issued in the context of a cartel case in the chemical distribution sector, constitutes a turnaround in the case law, although the Court of Appeals, ruling on the merits of the case, ultimately confirmed the fines imposed by the FCA.
The French Competition Authority Fines Dammann FRères Tea for Imposing Resale Prices on Its Online Retailers
On December 3, 2020, the French competition authority (“FCA”) imposed a fine of €226,000 on Dammann Frères (“Dammann”), a producer of gourmet tea, for imposing resale prices on its online retailers.
The Bonn Regional Court Dismisses Baywa’s Damages Action for State Liability Against the FCO in the Context of the Leniency Program
On December 2, 2020, the Regional Court of Bonn dismissed BayWa AG’s (“BayWa”) action for state liability against the Republic of Germany and the FCO for a breach of the constitutional prohibition of discrimination in the context of the FCO’s leniency program.[1]
Proposals for Reform of Competition Law Policy: Proposed Revision of the Commission’s Market Definition Guidance
Over the past several months, there have been a number of statements by politicians and Member State governments regarding the reform of EU competition law. Much of this debate is fundamentally linked to how authorities should define the relevant product and geographic markets that guide their antitrust and merger investigations.
New Investigative Power for the French Competition Authority to Access Telephone Communications Data
Decree n°2019-1247 of November 28, 2019, published in the Official Journal of the French Republic on November 29, 2019 (the “Decree”), provides the procedural framework for the FCA’s new power to access telephone communications data for the purpose of antitrust investigations under Article L. 450-3-3 of the French Commercial Code. This framework was introduced by the Pacte Law [1] and allows the FCA to request access to technical information regarding the identity of a caller, the telecommunication terminals used, the data, time, and duration of each call, and the phone numbers called. It will be operational as soon as the Data Request Supervisor (“contrôleur des demandes de données de connexion”) is appointed (the Supervisor will be appointed among the judges of the French Administrative or Civil Supreme Court).[2]
Pay-for-Delay Again: Commission Fines Teva and Cephalon €60.5 Million for Delaying Entry of Cheaper Generic Medicine
On November 26, 2020, the Commission fined Teva and Cephalon a total of €60.5 million for entering into a pay-for-delay agreement in relation to a sleep disorder drug. This arrangement is alleged to have helped maintain high prices for several years, to the detriment of patients and healthcare systems.[1]
FCO Conditionally Clears Furniture Merger
On November 25, 2020, after an in-depth investigation, the FCO approved the acquisition by Mann Mobilia Beteiligungs GmbH (part of the XXXLutz Group) of 50% of the shares in Möbel Management Holding GmbH & Co. KG and Roller GmbH & Co. KG (part of the Tessner Group), subject to the divestiture of 23 furniture outlets.[1] The FCO’s clearance only relates to the sales side of the transaction, i.e., the relationship between furniture retailers and consumers, whereas on November 30, 2020, the European Commission unconditionally cleared the transaction with respect to the procurement side, i.e., the relationship between furniture retailers and manufacturers.[2]
The French Supreme Court Reiterates That During Dawn Raids the Legal Privilege Is Only Applicable To Attorney-client Communications Which Concern the Exercise of the Rights of Defence
On November 25, 2020, the French Supreme Court ruled that attorney-client communications could not be seized during dawn raids provided they are related to the exercise of the client’s rights of defence.