On February 10, 2021, the Dortmund Regional Court set out principles for determining jurisdiction, specifically in competition damages litigation.[1]
The French Competition Authority Unconditionally Clears Engie’s Acquisition of a Stake in Hydrogen Producer and Distributor DMSE, Factoring in Growing “Green” Demand
On January 29, 2021, the French Competition Authority (“FCA”) unconditionally cleared Engie’s acquisition, through its subsidiary Storengy, of a controlling stake in Dijon Métropole Smart EnergHy (“DMSE”), a joint venture between Dijon Métropole and the Rougeot group specialized in the production and distribution of hydrogen.[1] The FCA cleared the concentration even though the combined entity will become the first and sole operator producing and distributing hydrogen in the Dijon area.
The French Competition Authority Publishes a Study on Professional Associations
In connection with the forthcoming transposition of Directive No. 2019/1 (the “ECN+ Directive”), which exposes professional associations to higher fines for anti-competitive practices, the French Competition Authority (“FCA”) has published a study on how competition law applies to professional associations and made a number of practical recommendations.[1]
Kerilee Investments Limited v International Tin Association Limited
On 26 January 2021, the CAT published notice of a claim for damages by Kerilee Investments Limited (Kerilee) against the International Tin Association Ltd (ITA). Kerilee is a metal trading SME, incorporated in the UK. The ITA is a UK-based and incorporated trade association and special purpose entity incorporated by guarantee in the UK. The ITA is responsible for the governance, policy, financial, executive and secretariat functions of the International Tin Supply Chain Initiative (ITSCI) conflict mineral due-diligence programme.
One-size-Fits-all: The Ethylene Decision Confirms the Commission’s Practice to Apply a 10% Fine Uplift to Purchaser Cartels
On January 22, 2021, the Commission published the non-confidential version of its July 2020 settlement decision, fining three purchasers of ethylene[1] a total of €260 million for infringing Article 101 TFEU.[2] The case is only the second purchaser cartel sanctioned by the Commission under the 2006 Fining Guidelines, after its Car battery recycling decision.[3]
The French Cour de Cassation Holds That Legal Privilege Applies to All Attorney-client Communications Relating to the Exercise of the Rights of Defence—Even Those Unrelated to the Antitrust Case in Relation to Which the Dawn Raids Are Carried Out
On January 20, 2021, the Criminal Chamber of the Cour de cassation ruled that none of the attorney-client communications relating to the exercise of the client’s rights of defence could be seized during dawn raids, even those that were not related to the antitrust case in relation to which the dawn raids were carried out.
The Court of Justice: Bid-rigging Cartels End With the Signing of the Tender Contract
On January 14, 2021, the Court of Justice held that a bid-rigging infringement[1] ends when the essential characteristics of the tender contract, in particular the amount to be paid for the works that are the subject of the tender contract, have been definitively agreed.[2] This is the moment when the successful bidder and the contracting authority conclude the tender contract, regardless of whether the payment instalments are made, or the works are completed, after this date.
FP McCann Limited v Competition and Markets Authority
On 13 January 2021, the CAT published an order confirming FP McCann Limited (FPM) had infringed the Chapter 1 Prohibition by engaging in a price-fixing and market sharing cartel. As a result, the first condition required for a competition directors disqualification order (CDO) against two of FPM’s directors, Eoin McCann and Francis McCann, was satisfied.
The French Competition Authority Reports on Its 2020 Activity and Announces Its Enforcement Priorities for 2021
On December 23, 2020, the French Competition Authority (“FCA”) presented a summary report of its 2020 activity and set out its priorities for 2021.[1]
TAR Lazio Quashes ICA Decision on Alleged Abuse of Dominant Position in Markets for the Collection of Waste Paper in Various Municipalities in Emilia Romagna
On December 22, 2020, the TAR Lazio quashed an infringement decision issued by the ICA (“ICA Decision”) against the public utility company Hera Holding Energia Risorse Ambiente S.p.A. (“Hera”) and its subsidiary Herambiente S.p.A. (“Herambiente”).[1] The ICA Decision found an alleged abuse of dominant position in the markets for the collection of waste paper in a number of municipalities in the region of Emilia- Romagna, for having favored Akron S.p.A. (“Akron”) – Herambiente’s subsidiary active in downstream markets – to the detriment of competitors.[2]