In May 2019, the CMA obtained competition disqualification undertakings (“CDUs”) from three individuals for involvement in a cartel relating to
The French Competition Authority Considers for the First Time an Overall Market for the Online and Offline Distribution of Toys
The French Competition Authority (the “FCA”) considered online and offline sales of toys as forming part of the same market in the context of its investigation of the merger of toy companies Luderix International and Jellej Jouets. The FCA thus relied once more on the methodology it applied in its Fnac/Darty merger clearance decision, when it concluded to the existence of a single market including both physical and online retail channels for the distribution of consumer electronics.
FCO Concludes Sector Inquiry Into Comparison Websites
On April 11, 2019, the Federal Cartel Office (“FCO”) published its final report on its sector inquiry into comparison websites.[1] This inquiry marked the first time that the FCO had analyzed a sector on the basis of its consumer protection competencies that have only recently been created. It clearly emphasized the agency’s ambition to expand its enforcement authority also into this area. Overall, the FCO came to the conclusion that several comparison portals infringed consumer rights in particular by providing misleading or incomplete information to consumers.
The General Court Dismisses Qualcomm’s Challenge of a Commission Request for Information
On April 9, 2019, the General Court dismissed Qualcomm’s application for annulment of a Commission decision of March 31, 2017, requiring Qualcomm to provide information in the context of an antitrust probe.
The Commission Fines General Electric €52 Million For Providing Incorrect Information During Merger Review
On April 8, 2019, the Commission fined General Electric (“GE”) €52 million for providing incorrect information during its 2017 investigation of GE’s acquisition of Danish wind turbine blade manufacturer LM Wind Power Holdings A/S (“LM Wind”).
The Court of Justice Clarifies the Prohibition of Double Jeopardy in Competition Law Cases
On April 3, 2019, the Court of Justice ruled that a national competition authority can in a single decision fine a company for infringing both EU and national competition law, without infringing the principle of ne bis in idem (double jeopardy).[1]
The General Court Rejects Application to Block Disclosure of Cartels Settlement Submissions To Interested Third Parties Following Ethanol Benchmark Case
Enforcement by Numbers
As the charts below show, enforcement by concurrent competition agencies has increased substantially since the ERRA came into force.[1]
Five Years of “Enhanced Concurrency” in UK Antitrust
In November 2013, David Currie – then Chairman of the CMA – identified the low volume of competition cases in regulated sectors: “These sectors account in total for some 25% of the economy. They are also typically characterised by monopolistic or oligopolistic market structures. This might suggest the need for more, rather than less, competition enforcement than in other parts of the economy.”[1]
The Hearing Officer for Competition Proceedings Publishes the Activity Report for 2017-2018
On March 22, 2019, the European Commission’s Hearing Officer published his Activity Report for 2017-2018.[1] The Report provides key statistics on the Hearing Officer’s activity as well as a useful summary of case law on various procedural issues.