Topics

On September 7, 2021, the TAR Lazio rejected the applications brought by associations of undertakings Anica, Anec and Anec Lazio (jointly the “Applicants”),[1] representing the Italian film and audiovisual industry, for the annulment of a decision in which the ICA imposed an interim cease and desist order in proceedings concerning an alleged anticompetitive conduct in relation to free outdoor film screenings.[2]

On September 10, 2021, the European Commission published a policy brief on “Competition Policy in Support of Europe’s Green Ambition” (the “Policy Brief”).[1] A year after Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager called for a greener EU competition policy,[2] the Policy Brief summarizes the key takeaways from the stakeholder consultation and sets out the Commission’s ambitions for a greener competition policy. The key message being that “a green competition policy still has to be – well, a competition policy.”[3]

In a decision dated September 9, 2021, the French Competition Authority (the “FCA”) imposed a total fine of €500,000 on several players in the road freight sector for participating in a single, complex and continuous infringement aimed at organizing a collective boycott of new digital intermediation platforms and geolocation software applications (the “Decision”).[1]

On September 6, 2021, the Council of State dismissed an appeal brought by the ICA[1] against a TAR Lazio judgment[2] that annulled an ICA decision[3] concerning the parent company – AIRI S.r.l.(the “Parent”) and its subsidiary Air Company S.r.l. (the “Subsidiary”, together, the “Parties”) – accused of participating in a cartel regarding helicopter transport services.

On September 2, 2021, Advocate General (“AG”) Bobek issued his opinions on two preliminary ruling requests, Bpost[1] and Nordzucker (the “Opinions”),[2] recommending to harmonize the principle of ne bis in idem—otherwise known as the double jeopardy test—in the EU, as it applies to all branches of EU law. AG Bobek suggested that application of the ne bis in idem principle should be based on a “triple identity” test: namely, of the offender, the relevant facts, and the protected legal interest.[3]