On September 24, 2019, the General Court ruled on the appeals against two of the Commission’s decisions ordering recovery of illegal state aid in back taxes that the Netherlands and Luxembourg allegedly provided to Starbucks Manufacturing EMEA BV (“Starbucks”) and Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe (“Fiat”) respectively.[1]
The General Court Renders Two Rulings Relating to the Transparency of the Commission Imposed Cartels Fines
On September 24, 2019, the General Court annulled a €33.6 million fine imposed on HSBC for its participation in the euro interest rate derivatives cartel,[1] and on the same day the General Court rejected Printeos’ appeal against the re-imposed fine for its participation in the envelope cartel.[2] Both cases relate to the methodology the Commission applied in calculating the fines and its transparency in that regard.
Commission Approves The Acquisition Of Innogy By E.ON Subject To Commitments
Following a public consultation launched in July 2019,[1] the Commission adopted a guidance document[2] on the protection of confidential information in proceedings for the private enforcement of EU competition law based on the Antitrust Damages Directive (“ADD”).[3] The Confidentiality Guidance is intended for use by national courts to ensure consistency across Member States regarding access to and the protection of confidential information disclosed in private enforcement proceedings. The Communication is not binding and does not modify the rules applicable in different Member States, but rather outlines a number of measures and tools national courts may employ to help protect confidential information.
Access to File: The Tar Lazio Emphasizes the Boundary Between the Rights of Defense and the Right of Access to Leniency Applications
On September 16, 2019, the TAR Lazio rejected the application for annulment filed by MP Silva S.r.l. (“MP Silva”) against an ICA decision that had denied the applicant access to the file in an Article 101 TFEU investigation.[1]
Vigorous Antitrust Enforcement Likely To Continue During Margrethe Vestager’s Second Term as Competition Commissioner
Margrethe Vestager has been re-appointed as Commissioner for Competition for a second term. If her appointment is approved by the European Parliament, as is expected, she would be in line for a combined 10-year term, which would make her the longest-serving Competition Commissioner. In addition to the competition portfolio, Ms. Vestager will also take on responsibility for the “a Europe fit for the digital age” agenda, and has been designated as one of the executive vice-presidents of the Commission.
General Court Upholds Poland’s Challenge To OPAL Pipeline Decision
On September 10, 2019, the General Court annulled a European Commission decision concerning the Ostseepipeline-Anbindungsleitung (“OPAL”) gas pipeline for breaching the principle of energy solidarity. The decision approved raising a cap on Gazprom’s use of the pipeline.
Roadmap For The Evaluation Of The Horizontal Block Exemption Regulations Open For Comments
Two Cycling Groups Call For Antitrust Probe Into Governing Body For Sports Cycling
In September 2019, cycling organizations Velon and the Italian Cycling League filed separate complaints with the Commission, alleging that the world governing body for sports cycling, Union Cycliste Internationale (“UCI”), breached EU competition law in its dual role of regulating and organizing cycling events.[1]
The Court of Justice in Tibor-trans Expands Forum Options for Cartels Damages Claimants
On July 29, 2019, the Court of Justice confirmed that the Hungarian courts had jurisdiction to rule on damages claims brought by Tibor-Trans Fuvarozó és Kereskedelmi Kft. (“Tibor-Trans”), a Hungarian logistics company, against DAF Trucks N.V. (“DAF”), one of the members of the EU-wide trucks cartel.[1] The Court of Justice clarified that cartel victims may claim damages in any Member State affected by a cartel, even where they had no direct contractual relationship with the cartelists.
Commission Fines Qualcomm €242 Million In Its First Predatory Pricing Decision In Almost Two Decades
On July 18, 2019, the Commission fined Qualcomm €242 million for abusing its dominance in the global market for broadband chipsets by selling below cost to “strategically important” customers, to force a competitor out of the market.[1] This is the first time in 16 years that the Commission has fined a company for predatory pricing after the Wanadoo decision of 2003.[2]