On 5 March 2020, the Court of Appeal dismissed Network Rail’s application to appeal a CAT decision which found that
Industries
The TAR Lazio Quashes the ICA Decision Imposing Commitments on Sky After Its Withdrawal of the Notification of the R2 Acquisition
On March 5, 2020, the TAR Lazio annulled the ICA decision of May 20, 2019, concerning the acquisition of sole control of R2 S.r.l. (“R2”) by Sky Italia S.r.l. (“Sky”), including the measures imposed on Sky.[1]
Iiyama (UK) Limited and Others V Samsung Electronics Co. Limited and Others (LCD Cartels)
On 4 March 2020, the CAT ordered that the damages claim brought by Iiyama against Samsung in relation to the…
Court of Justice Upholds Commission’s Two Fines Against Marine Harvest for Gun-jumping
On March 4, 2020, the Court of Justice dismissed Mowi ASA (formerly Marine Harvest ASA)’s appeal against two fines for having acquired control over salmon producer Morpol prior to the European Commission’s (the “Commission”) merger control approval.[1] The judgment clarifies the scope of Article 7(2) of the EU Merger Regulation (the “EUMR”), which allows an acquisition of control to be notified after the fact, if it takes place in the context of a public bid. The judgment explains that the exemption does not apply if the public bid follows an initial, separate, transaction which already gave rise to an acquisition of control. The judgment also confirms that the Commission is allowed to impose two separate fines when a transaction is implemented before the merger notification. This article updates our analysis of the General Court judgment as reported in our European Competition Report of Q 4, 2017.
TAR Lazio Confirms the ICA Commitment Decision Concerning a Co-investment Agreement for the Rollout of Fiber to the Home Technology
On March 3, 2020, the TAR Lazio rejected the appeal brought by Open Fiber S.p.A. (“Open Fiber”, an operator active in the development of optical fiber networks based on the Fiber to the Home technology) for the annulment of the commitment decision adopted by the ICA in proceedings against Telecom Italia S.p.A. (“TIM”) and Fastweb S.p.A. (“Fastweb”), concerning the markets for wholesale access to the fixed network and fixed broadband and ultra- wideband retail telecommunications services.[1]
The Council of State Annuls an ICA Decision Imposing Interim Measures on Taxi Torino in an Investigation Into an Alleged Abuse of Dominance in the Market for the Collection and Sorting of Orders for Taxi Services in the City of Turin
On March 3, 2020, the Council of State granted the appeal filed by Società Cooperativa Taxi Torino (“Taxi Torino”) against the judgment issued by the Regional Administrative Tribunal for Latium (the “TAR Lazio”) on June 7, 2019.[1] The TAR Lazio had upheld the ICA decision of November 29, 2018, which imposed interim measures in an investigation concerning an alleged abuse in the market for the collection and sorting of orders for taxi services in Turin.[2]
FCO Conditionally Clears CinemaxX/ Cinestar Merger
On March 2, 2020, after an in-depth investigation, the FCO approved cinema operator Vue Nederland B.V. (“Vue Group”)’s acquisition of its competitor Edge Investments B.V., 2015 First Holding GmbH, and Greater Union International GmbH. [1] The approval is subject to the divestment of cinemas in six regions. The Vue Group operates 31 cinemas in Germany, 30 under the brand “CinemaxX”. The targets operate 53 cinemas in Germany, 51 under the brand “Cinestar”.
DG COMP Responds to the COVID-19 Outbreak (March 2020)
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant economic disruption, including supply shortages, cost increases, and liquidity constraints resulting from a prolonged shutdown. As EU Member States and businesses respond to these challenges, and even as lockdown measures are gradually eased, their actions continue to raise potential issues under competition law.
SP Power Systems and Others V Prysmian Spa and Others, National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc V ABB Ltd and Others (Power Cables Cartels)
On 28 February 2020, the High Court handed down an order transferring two damages claims for breaches of Article 101…
The Italian Supreme Court Rules on Limitation Periods and Evidentiary Value of Commitment Decisions in Follow-on Actions
On February 27, 2020, the Italian Supreme Court fully upheld a judgment of the Milan Court of Appeals, which had dismissed the damages claim of Uno Communications S.p.A. (“UNO”) against Vodafone Italia S.p.A. (“Vodafone”).[1]