Energy, Chemicals & Infrastructure

On March 14, 2019, the ECJ held that the determination of persons liable for damages for an EU competition law infringement is governed by EU law, not national law.[1] The ECJ clarified that an acquirer company may be held liable for private damages caused by a cartel participant even after the cartel participant was subsequently liquidated, provided that the acquirer took over the assets that constituted the business. The ECJ agreed with Advocate General Wahl[2] that the principle of economic continuity should apply not only in public, but also in private antitrust enforcement.

On March 5, 2019, the French Competition Authority celebrated its 10 years of existence. The President of the Competition Authority listed her priorities for the coming years, which include the retail sector and purchasing alliances, digital economy, “predatory” acquisitions and reflection on ex post control, as well as the labour market and labour collective agreements.

On February 26, 2019, the FCO approved RWE AG’s (“RWE”) acquisition of a minority stake of 16.67% in E.ON SE (“E.ON”).[1] The acquisition is part of a complex share and asset swap deal between the two energy companies. Following the share and asset swap, E.ON will focus on the distribution and retail of electricity and gas, whereas RWE will be primarily active in upstream electricity generation and wholesale markets.

On 15 February 2019, the Court of Appeal dismissed Balmoral Tanks’ (Balmoral) appeal against the October 2017 CAT judgment upholding the CMA’s decision to fine Balmoral £130,000 for exchanging pricing information with three other suppliers of galvanised steel tanks at a single meeting in July 2012. Although Balmoral refused to join the cartel operated by the three other suppliers, its CEO nonetheless remained at the meeting and shared information about Balmoral’s current and future pricing intentions.

On February 14, 2019, the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) found in SA-Capital Oy v. Finland, that the Finnish Supreme Administrative Court had not violated SA-Capital’s right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights by partially relying on hearsay evidence in finding the existence and the scope of a cartel.[1] In particular, given the evidentiary complexity of cartel infringements, the ECtHR concluded that national competition authorities may use hearsay to the extent their findings do not solely depend on it.[2]

On February 6, 2019—the same day the Siemens/Alstom decision was adopted—and again following a Phase II investigation, the Commission prohibited German rolled copper products manufacturer Wieland’s proposed acquisition of Aurubis’s rival business and of its 50% stake in the parties’ pre-rolled strip manufacturing joint-venture Schwermetall.[1]

On February 6, 2019, the Commission[1] prohibited the then-proposed combination of Siemens AG’s (“Siemens”) mobility business and Alstom S.A. (“Alstom”) which put an end to the parties’ ambition of creating a European Champion in the rail industry.[2] The Financial Times called this Phase 2 investigation “one of the most important test cases for the commission since it assumed powers to vet EU mergers in 1989.”[3]

On March 6, 2020, the Commission approved Telecom Italia and Vodafone’s acquisition of joint control over INWIT, which will combine the companies’ 22,000 telecommunication towers in Italy.[1] The approval was obtained during Phase I and is conditioned on third-party access to the infrastructure.