On June 2, 2020, the Commission published two inception impact assessments[1] and two public consultations which address two new policy initiatives: (1) a new market investigation tool (“new competition tool”);[2] and (2) a regulatory instrument that would ex ante govern large online platforms that act as gatekeepers with significant network effects in the European Union’s internal market.[3] These initiatives are part of the Commission’s wider efforts to modernize EU competition law in an era of digitalization. Stakeholders are invited to submit their comments up until September 8, 2020[4] and the impact assessments are expected to be submitted to the Regulatory Scrutiny Board of the Commission and be finalized in the fourth quarter of 2020.
Consumer Goods & Retail

JD Sports Fashion plc v Competition and Markets Authority
On 13 November 2020, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) partially upheld JD Sports’ appeal against the CMA’s decision to prohibit its completed acquisition of Footasylum requiring it to fully divest Footasylum.[1] The CMA found that the parties were close competitors in sports-inspired casual clothing and footwear in stores and online. The CMA concluded there was no evidence that the impact of COVID-19 would remove its competition concerns.
Sabre Corporation v Competition and Markets Authority
On 21 May 2021, the CAT dismissed Sabre’s challenge of the CMA’s decision to block its proposed acquisition of Farelogix.…
Implications of the Three/O2 Judgment for EU Merger Control
On May 28, 2020 the General Court overturned Commissioner Vestager’s first prohibition decision, blocking a 4-to-3 merger in the UK…
The Commission Waives Merger Commitments in Takeda/Shire and Nidec/Whirlpool
The Commission’s Notice on remedies states that waivers “will very rarely be relevant for divestiture commitments” and since divestiture commitments are required to be implemented in a short time after the decision, it is “very unlikely” that sufficient changes in market circumstances will have occurred for the Commission to accept any modifications of the commitments.[1] In May 2020, the Commission waived commitments given to secure merger control approval in two cases.
The Commission Publishes Support Studies for the Evaluation of the Vertical Block Exemption Regulation
Following the Commission’s roadmap and launch of the public consultation process,[1] on May 26, 2020, the Commission published the final report[2] with support studies for the evaluation of the Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (the “VBER”).[3] The report is part of the Commission’s evaluation of the VBER, which is set to expire on May 31, 2022.
The French Competition Authority (“FCA”) Accepts Fix-it-First Remedy and Unprecedented Behavioral Commitments in a Major Overseas Retail Deal
On May 26, 2020, the FCA conditionally approved Bernard Hayot Group’s €219 million acquisition of the Vindémia Group—one of the largest deals in French overseas territories ever reviewed by the FCA.[1] Further to an on-site investigation, the FCA cleared the transaction in Phase I, subject to a fix-it-first remedy and behavioral commitments.
COVID-19 Update: Time-limits for Merger Control and Antitrust Proceedings Are Gradually Resuming
By Order No. 2020-560 of May 13, 2020, the Government decided not to further postpone the time limits that had been suspended or interrupted since March 12, 2020, despite the extension of the state of health emergency. Consistently, in a press release of May 18, 2020, the French Competition Authority (“FCA”) announced that it would progressively re-instate the statutory time limits that had been interrupted or suspended in light of the state of health emergency. All of these time limits will resume on June 24, 2020 at the latest.[1]
No Prima Facie Evidence for Causal Harm in Information Exchange Cases
On May 12, 2020, the Frankfurt am Main Court of Appeals found drugstore chain Anton Schlecker e.K. i.I.’s (“Schlecker”) insolvency estate was not entitled to cartel follow-on damages.[1] In the Court of Appeals’ view, Arndt Geiwitz, Schlecker’s insolvency receiver acting on behalf of the estate, did not prove the estate incurred damages as a result of the cartel’s information exchange.
DG COMP Responds To The COVID-19 Outbreak (May 2020)
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant economic disruption, including supply shortages, cost increases, and liquidity constraints resulting from a prolonged shutdown. As EU Member States and businesses respond to these challenges, their actions could raise potential issues under competition law.