Consumer Goods & Retail

In connection with the forthcoming transposition of Directive No. 2019/1 (the “ECN+ Directive”), which exposes professional associations to higher fines for anti-competitive practices, the French Competition Authority (“FCA”) has published a study on how competition law applies to professional associations and made a number of practical recommendations.[1]

On January 20, 2021, the Commission imposed fines totaling €7.8 million on Valve, the owner of the video gaming platform Steam, and five PC video game publishers[1] for breaching Article 101 TFEU. The Commission found that the companies prevented gamers from activating certain PC video games purchased from sellers in eight Central and Eastern European Member States, where prices are generally lower than in other Member States (so-called “geo-blocking”).[2] This decision is a reminder of the Commission’s strict stance on cross-border sales restrictions.

On December 23, 2020, the French Competition Authority (“FCA”) presented a summary report of its 2020 activity and set out its priorities for 2021.[1]

Kaufland/Real and Globus/Real

On December 22, 2020, the FCO cleared the acquisitions of up to 92 “Real” retail stores from SCP Retail S.à.r.l. (“SCP”) by Kaufland Immobilien & Co. KG and Kaufland Dienstleistung GmbH (“Kaufland”)[1] and of up to 24 stores by Globus Holding GmbH & Co. KG (“Globus”).[2] The clearance of Kaufland’s acquisition was subject to Kaufland foregoing the acquisition of nine of the originally planned 101 stores to address concerns in individual local sales markets. Further, SCP undertook to sell Real stores with a total procurement volume of € 200 million p. a. to medium-sized retailers.

On December 14, 2020, six years after the adoption of the Damages Directive,[1] the Commission published a report[2] analyzing its implementation across Member States.[3] The Damages Directive was introduced to harmonize the procedural rules for antitrust damages actions.

On 15 October 2020, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) revoked a £300,000 penalty it had imposed on JD Sports Fashion plc for breach of an interim enforcement order (IEO) issued in connection with JD Sports’ completed acquisition of Footasylum plc. The penalty was withdrawn “[i]n light of issues raised on appeal.” This is the first time that a CMA procedural fine has been revoked or overturned on appeal. On 19 and 20 October 2020, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) heard Facebook’s appeal against the CMA’s refusal to grant a derogation from an IEO issued in connection with Facebook’s completed acquisition of GIPHY, Inc. This article considers potential implications of these cases for future UK mergers.

Over the past several months, there have been a number of statements by politicians and Member State governments regarding the reform of EU competition law. Much of this debate is fundamentally linked to how authorities should define the relevant product and geographic markets that guide their antitrust and merger investigations.